The English time period "empiric" derives from the Greek term ἐμπειρία, which is cognate with and translates on the Latin experientia, from which we derive the term "experience" and the related "experiment". The time period
Inside the second sentence (my bold characters), whether or not I selected to have a completely new auto is just not what is emphasized; what is emphasised may be the time and effort it took to adapt to the new condition, what I had to do to adjust to it.
Stack Exchange network contains 183 Q&A communities such as Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and Make their careers. Take a look at Stack Exchange
Individually, more frequently than not, I don't find a double "that" to generally be distracting or leading to confusion in the least. Really the Opposite: This is a) correctly self-explanatory and b) it certainly leads to less
I'm getting difficulty Googling a reference because of the "of", but it is a standard phrase - not bad creating in any way. Perhaps a little aged-fashioned. It could also imply "used by" - you will find an aged hymn Used of God - but that's a different phrase.
The construction that gets pronounced with /zd/ goes such as this: A shovel is used to dig with. That's not an idiom, instead of a constituent, either.
Stack Exchange network contains 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to know, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Check out Stack Exchange
Context can provide the purpose of saying "but not the two". Should your Mother states "you will get the jawbreaker or perhaps the bubblegum", you know that she (properly) gained't Allow you to have equally. But when she intends to Enable you to website have both equally, even when context indicates in any other case, she will be able to say:
are entirely different terms, they must have entirely different meanings. Overlap is indicated with a slash, since "you may walk about the purple and or or maybe the blue squares" could be unacceptable.
In English "or" will likely be taken being exclusive or, if you wish to particularly use inclusive or then use "and/or".
z7sg Ѫz7sg Ѫ 13.3k1919 gold badges6666 silver badges102102 bronze badges 13 Not attempting to pick a nit right here, but for the second response, what does "failed to use to become" indicate?
is compactness within the goal House needed for existence for extending constant function from dense subspace?
can only indicate OR. As it's possible you'll have observed, each of the phrases look identical which leads to your confusion in parsing sentences like your title.
The two the phrases suggest that an action has actually been finished frequently; they aren't used to refer to actions that transpired only at the time.